Re: About DNS
From: The Unknown Hacker (jackassdennis@hotmail.nospam.com)
Date: 01/28/03
- Next message: Tim Haynes: "Re: About DNS"
- Previous message: dragon: "About DNS"
- In reply to: dragon: "About DNS"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: About DNS"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: About DNS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "The Unknown Hacker" <jackassdennis@hotmail.nospam.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:24:33 GMT
This is an easy one:
user bind is a privileged user (it can only handle this daemon)
This means that all associated files of named have owner permission for root
and bind
Conclusion: bind is an invoked user and cannot have a shell
"dragon" <siao@eastmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:b168eg$7u7@netnews.hinet.net...
> Fact : Only root can bind the privileged ports(0~1023)
> Fact : DNS service uses port 53
> Fact : In my system, the effective user of the process "named" is "bind"
> Question : How can this user "bind" uses port 53?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
- Next message: Tim Haynes: "Re: About DNS"
- Previous message: dragon: "About DNS"
- In reply to: dragon: "About DNS"
- Next in thread: Kasper Dupont: "Re: About DNS"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: About DNS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|