Re: ipchains: pop3 & imap, access
From: bossman (nospam@nospam.com)
Date: 01/14/03
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: HELP_QUESTION: Possible Security Problem with Sendmail/RedHat"
- Previous message: Chris Cox: "Re: NIS or NIS + setup"
- In reply to: Mark Simon: "ipchains: pop3 & imap, access"
- Next in thread: Mark Simon: "Re: ipchains: pop3 & imap, access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: bossman <nospam@nospam.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:23:32 +0000
Mark Simon wrote:
> I have tried to find a simple solution to this, but ipchains just
> befuddles me.
You might want to think about switching to iptables. I find it to be a
better firewall.
> but I don't understand the resulting script. Here is an extract:
>
> ipchains -A input -i eth1 -p tcp \
> --source-port 1024:65535 \
> -d extIP 110 -j ACCEPT
The \ at the end just mean that the command is continued on the next line.
The above would look like this:
ipchains -A input -i eth1 -p tcp --source-port 1024:65535 -d extIP 100 -j
ACCEPT
-i eth1 input interface
-p tcp type of protocol
--source-port 1024:65535 all port in this range 1024 thru 65535
-d extIP destination port 110 (??)
-j ACCEPT Allow it to pass
-- Regards Robert Smile..... It increases your face value. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: HELP_QUESTION: Possible Security Problem with Sendmail/RedHat"
- Previous message: Chris Cox: "Re: NIS or NIS + setup"
- In reply to: Mark Simon: "ipchains: pop3 & imap, access"
- Next in thread: Mark Simon: "Re: ipchains: pop3 & imap, access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]