Re: KTH Kerberos 4 won't compile
From: Gregory Davis (GregDavis@umbc.edu)
Date: 01/05/03
- Next message: Whoever: "Re: Block port 110 on firewall (not the pop service)"
- Previous message: panic: "Re: What are these hits on my firewall?"
- In reply to: Tim Haynes: "Re: KTH Kerberos 4 won't compile"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Gregory Davis <GregDavis@umbc.edu> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 20:31:10 -0500
Tim Haynes wrote:
>
> You have a (gross) mismatch of ndbm requirement & provision; read through
> the ndbm.h header file for the function definition in question, see how
> many arguments & what types/names they are. Compare this with the crud
> that kerberos is flinging at it and weep. :8]
...
For a while I did weep. I just downgraded to db-4.0 and that did the trick.
Apparently, the function signature changed. I was hoping someone had a fix
for Kerberos to upgrade it. What the heck, I guess I could do that in my
spare time if no one else is interested; open source is great.
I was building as root, shame on me. I should know better, as concrete
evidence suggests. It might have been the KTH project's previous stable
release I'm thinking about, or maybe it was some other security/network
project, but a trojan got into a source release and was propogated through
mirrors prompting a cleanup release. Check the pgp signatures of your
tarballs! Make pgp signatures for your tarballs!
Greg
- Next message: Whoever: "Re: Block port 110 on firewall (not the pop service)"
- Previous message: panic: "Re: What are these hits on my firewall?"
- In reply to: Tim Haynes: "Re: KTH Kerberos 4 won't compile"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]