Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy
From: Luke Vogel (luke@bell-bird.com.au)
Date: 12/18/02
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Previous message: David Goodenough: "Re: strange file in root dir"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Luke Vogel <luke@bell-bird.com.au> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:54:39 +1000
Bill Unruh wrote:
> Luke Vogel <luke@bell-bird.com.au> writes:
>
> ]Wayne Pollock wrote:
>
>
> ]> was wiped and a new OS loaded on it.) /proc is good!
> ]>
> ]> -Wayne
>
> ]... So is NOT top posting. A bit of judicious trimming might have saved
> ]a lot of us a bit of time not having to go through the whole bleeding
> ]post too!
>
> ?? You had his response at the top. If you wanted to know what it
> refered to the original posts were there? What is your complaint?
My complaint is that I (and everyone else) had to wade through a whole
long thread to determine that he only wrote something at the top.
> I detest bottom posting where I have to wade through hectares of old
> stuff only to find finally and OK at the bottom.
Me too!!! That is why I asked for some judicious trimming.
I'm not going to get into a flame over this again, I'm just asking for a
bit of courtesy for all here who participate.
-- Regards Luke ------ When I die, I want to die like my Grandmother who died peacefully in her sleep. Not screaming like all the passengers in her car. ------ C.O.L.S FAQ - http://www.linuxsecurity.com/docs/colsfaq.html ------
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Previous message: David Goodenough: "Re: strange file in root dir"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
