/proc/NNNNN accuracy
From: Jem Berkes (jb@users.pc9.org)
Date: 12/17/02
- Next message: /dev/rob0: "Re: cdrom security"
- Previous message: Sundial Services: "Re: Stealth TCP"
- Next in thread: Sundial Services: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Reply: Sundial Services: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Jem Berkes <jb@users.pc9.org> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:54:32 GMT
I just discovered this today... the PID directories in the /proc filesystem
that refer to running processes (with all kinds of nice info, command line,
status, etc.!)
This is interesting for me because it appears that I can read these files
and directories directly with my scripts.
BUT: is the /proc/pid information accurate? Can a process hide itself by
deleting its associated subdirectory? Or is this list definitive?
I realize a running program could change its command line etc. to make it
appear like a different program. That aside, what I'm trying to get 100%
accurate info on is: the uid the program is running under, and whether it's
running. Does the /proc/pid structure give this with total accuracy?
-- Jem Berkes http://www.pc-tools.net/ Windows, Linux & UNIX software
- Next message: /dev/rob0: "Re: cdrom security"
- Previous message: Sundial Services: "Re: Stealth TCP"
- Next in thread: Sundial Services: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Reply: Sundial Services: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Reply: Kasper Dupont: "Re: /proc/NNNNN accuracy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|