Re: NAT Traversal
From: /dev/null (dev'0x2e'null@BeginThread.com)
Date: 12/11/02
- Next message: Man Attitude: "Log"
- Previous message: /dev/null: "Re: corporate grade security checklists?"
- In reply to: Andre: "NAT Traversal"
- Next in thread: Natman: "Re: NAT Traversal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "/dev/null" <dev'0x2e'null@BeginThread.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:51:36 GMT
> The only conclusion I've been able to come up with, and this is from
tailing
> log files while trying to transfer files, is that iptables is dropping the
> packets from the other end because it's somehow "seeing" the other side's
> internal ip address.
Then the problem would have to be on their end. Your iptables wouldn't know
how to route to someone else's internal IP address, nor would any other
router along the way. Just like you have to do a S-NAT on outbound traffic,
so do they. If they don't, there's nothing you can do about it.
- Next message: Man Attitude: "Log"
- Previous message: /dev/null: "Re: corporate grade security checklists?"
- In reply to: Andre: "NAT Traversal"
- Next in thread: Natman: "Re: NAT Traversal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|