Re: What are the dangers of having a Webserver?
From: /dev/rob0 (rob0@gmx.co.uk)
Date: 12/01/02
- Next message: Lee Grey: "Have I been hacked?"
- Previous message: Dimitri Maziuk: "Re: SSH Prob"
- In reply to: Bonno Bloksma: "Re: What are the dangers of having a Webserver?"
- Next in thread: Cameron L. Spitzer: "Re: What are the dangers of having a Webserver?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk> Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 13:02:32 -0800
In article <3dea3cf5$0$94305$e4fe514c@dreader4.news.xs4all.nl>,
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> If it is realy that easy... Why would anyone even want to use Unix/Linux as
> as workstation in a corporate environment? I know Redhat and others are
Linux in the hands of a clueless sysadmin can indeed be very dangerous.
Linux in the hands of a good sysadmin can be very strong, stable, and
secure.
Windows in the hands of ANY sysadmin is ... Windows.
> pushing Linux as a workstation but what you and others have written would
> mean any corporation doing this would be nuts. All workstations would we
> wide open and maybe a lot of servers as well.
Under the assumption you seem to be making, sure. It's a silly
assumption, however. :) I don't think you understood what was written in
this thread.
-- /dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply
- Next message: Lee Grey: "Have I been hacked?"
- Previous message: Dimitri Maziuk: "Re: SSH Prob"
- In reply to: Bonno Bloksma: "Re: What are the dangers of having a Webserver?"
- Next in thread: Cameron L. Spitzer: "Re: What are the dangers of having a Webserver?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
