Re: Linux - Poster child for security glitches
From: /dev/rob0 (rob0@gmx.co.uk)
Date: 11/24/02
- Next message: Steve Harper: "Logging Question"
- Previous message: Tim Haynes: "Re: SSH log message"
- In reply to: Simon Cooke: "Re: Linux - Poster child for security glitches"
- Next in thread: Wild Wizard: "Re: Linux - Poster child for security glitches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:51:50 -0800
In article <iORD9.6071$OZ4.627239@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
Simon Cooke wrote:
>> totally defeating the purpose of privileges.) I guess now there is a
>> form of "su" for Windows, but it wasn't there when I used NT.
>
> Yes, there was. You just didn't look hard enough.
Interesting. And yet I felt I was pretty competent with NT. This seems
to suggest that some of their user-friendly (or admin-friendly anyway)
features may be deliberately hidden from users/admins.
IAC I am not going back to look now. :)
This will be EOT for me because I don't care for advocacy arguments. I
prefer to advocate by doing. Followup-to set to comp.os.linux.advocacy
(where I won't see it. :)
-- /dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply
- Next message: Steve Harper: "Logging Question"
- Previous message: Tim Haynes: "Re: SSH log message"
- In reply to: Simon Cooke: "Re: Linux - Poster child for security glitches"
- Next in thread: Wild Wizard: "Re: Linux - Poster child for security glitches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]