Re: Why doesn't noexec work?
From:Date: 11/12/02
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: webalizer and iptables"
- Previous message: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- Reply: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:41:06 +0100
Jem Berkes <jb2002-delete-this-AND-users@users.pc9.org> writes:
> Besides executing binaries, I can also set suid as demonstrated below:
I would expect you to be able to set bit but I wouldn't expect them to
have any effect.
> But luckily, user quotas are working fine. Does this have anything to do
> with the one-higher mount point not having these flags?
>
> /dev/hda8 on /var type ext2 (rw)
Nope. On all the system I have used for testing / is mountet with no
special flags and my test filesystem has been mounted at /mnt. Not
that I would expect it to have any influence.
-- Peter Makholm | I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to peter@makholm.net | me, to everyone, and may each of you fry in hell http://hacking.dk | forever | -- The Dead Past
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: webalizer and iptables"
- Previous message: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- Reply: Jem Berkes: "Re: Why doesn't noexec work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]