Re: port 445 blocked
From: Tim Pailthorpe (tim@!SPAM.hod.co.uk)Date: 10/08/02
- Next message: Ross: "Use Windows 2000 User Authentication for Apache"
- Previous message: : "Re: Wich port for Server Monitor and Server Status on OS X"
- In reply to: Tim Dijkstra: "port 445 blocked"
- Next in thread: Tim Dijkstra: "Re: port 445 blocked"
- Reply: Tim Dijkstra: "Re: port 445 blocked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Tim Pailthorpe" <tim@!SPAM.hod.co.uk> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:51:19 +0100
Hi Tim.
Do you mean 443?
If you have changed SSL to 445 are the users using
https://my.host:445/blah.html ?
Tim
"Tim Dijkstra" <newsuser@famdijkstra.org> wrote in message
news:20021008114200.5ff3cbf2.newsuser@famdijkstra.org...
> Hi,
>
> I had my apache listening on port 445 for https connections, this worked
> perfectly for a long time. Today I got a message from a user stating
> that he couldn't get a connection. I have since then reproduced the
> problem from a few domains. Then I checked everything: firewall, apache
> logs, etc, but couldn't find a problem with my conf. Could it be that
> there are some ISP's that are blocking 445? I found some reference to
> DoS attacks on windows machines targeted at port 445..
>
> thnx Tim
- Next message: Ross: "Use Windows 2000 User Authentication for Apache"
- Previous message: : "Re: Wich port for Server Monitor and Server Status on OS X"
- In reply to: Tim Dijkstra: "port 445 blocked"
- Next in thread: Tim Dijkstra: "Re: port 445 blocked"
- Reply: Tim Dijkstra: "Re: port 445 blocked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|