Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???
From:Date: 09/13/02
- Next message: Jack Ass: "Re: badblocks"
- Previous message: Fredderic: "Re: Safer floppy disks..."
- Maybe in reply to: no-KOREAN-spam: "KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Next in thread: Luke Vogel: "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Reply: Luke Vogel: "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Reply: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Reply: : "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:27:11 +0100
no-KOREAN-spam <nospam@NOSPAM-from.KOREA> writes:
> Koreans are not only the world's leading consumers of SPAM
> (the edible kind), but also the world's leading SOURCE of electronic
> SPAM. They are obstinate, persistent, and incessant, and simply ignore
> all politely worded complaints.
Is there some REASON you're SHOUTING half the time?
> Only Brazil and China come anywhere _NEAR_ creating the
> amoung to SPAM and UCE that they generate each day.
You don't mean spam or UCE. You mean UBE; that's what the problem is. All
UBE is theft, and it encompasses UCE and more. (And `spam' is a usenet-only
term, not applicable to email, and subject to too-many people's rather
vague and woolly "definition"s.)
[snip]
> QUESTION: Could someone kindly direct a newbie on how to deal with
> this problem?
I'd start with taking a deep breath and a cold shower, if I were you.
> Constant complaints to the webmasters do nothing. This poster is
> considering the following action(s): to set up the system so that any
> emails which are in Korean, or originate from Korea, are bounced back to
> the originators,
Naff idea. All you'll do is at least double the network bandwidth consumed,
probably treble it:
a) incoming mail gets all the way in, that's 1 unit of processing;
b) mail goes back out again, that's another unit (especially so if
it subsequently bounces, as it will because the return-path is
faked);
c) mail goes on to abuse@, that's a 3rd unit;
d) mail goes to a valid innocent user whose name was impersonated
in the spam, well, you've got a lawsuit on your hands.
I'd say you're probably best-off filtering out
1) mails with invalid syntax - use `headers_check_syntax' in exim;
2) Korean IP#s - dig through APNIC to see what IP blocks the country
has, and ban them from connecting to your mail-server.
Also, get a proper spam filter such as _ifile_, _spamprobe_ and
_spamassassin_ (pick one of the first two and definitely the latter), fold
up your probably-spam folder so you only read it once a week, check your
rejectlog for relay attempts and dump the perps into the IP#-block
periodically, see what happens.
~Tim
-- They did a dance called America |piglet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk They danced it round |http://spodzone.org.uk/ And waited at the turns |
- Next message: Jack Ass: "Re: badblocks"
- Previous message: Fredderic: "Re: Safer floppy disks..."
- Maybe in reply to: no-KOREAN-spam: "KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Next in thread: Luke Vogel: "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Reply: Luke Vogel: "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Reply: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Reply: : "Re: KOREAN SPAM: HOWTO deal with it???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|