Re: Have these config files been compromised?
From: Russ Johnson (russj@dimstar.net)Date: 07/03/02
- Next message: RainbowHat: "Re: Awu / Wu / Autowu trojan"
- Previous message: Michael (Cegonha): "Re: Unable to Nat with iptables"
- In reply to: The Broken One: "Have these config files been compromised?"
- Next in thread: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Have these config files been compromised?"
- Reply: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Have these config files been compromised?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:49:43 -0700 From: Russ Johnson <russj@dimstar.net>
On Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:27:14 GMT
The Broken One <mindwerks$smapno@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I was checking out my /etc/sysconfig directory in RH 7.2 when I noticed
> these file dates and sizes. In particular the files that have 2001 where
> the time field should be. Has this system been compromised or is this a
> filesystem problem (EXT3) or what? Thanks!
On most unix type systems, the time will only be displayed on files that are less than one year old. After that, the time is replaced by the year.
In other words, what you are seeing is normal behavior.
--
"The power to untie is stronger than the power to tie."
Well, yeah, otherwise my shoes would tie themselves.
---
Russ Johnson
Stargate Online
http://www.dimstar.net
telnet://telnet.dimstar.net
ICQ: 3739685:Airneil
- Next message: RainbowHat: "Re: Awu / Wu / Autowu trojan"
- Previous message: Michael (Cegonha): "Re: Unable to Nat with iptables"
- In reply to: The Broken One: "Have these config files been compromised?"
- Next in thread: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Have these config files been compromised?"
- Reply: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Have these config files been compromised?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
