Re: double the buffer? - buffer overflows

From: svek (
Date: 06/21/02

From: svek <>
Date: 21 Jun 2002 16:30:46 GMT

Rex Dieter <> wrote in news:aevinb$fht$

> Sure it was a beta, but redhat chose to use it because it was STILL
> better than anything available at the time (especially to support
> archs other than x86).

I don't judge redhat, they probably had their reasons but in my opinion one
should use stable software in a stable release.
but then again that is one of the reasons I don't use redhat.