Re: recommendation on an exploit and malicious software
From: Luke Vogel (luke@bell-bird.com.au)Date: 05/25/02
- Next message: svek: "Re: Why is BSD more secure?"
- Previous message: John Oakes: "Re: Certificate Server"
- In reply to: Andrew: "recommendation on an exploit and malicious software"
- Next in thread: Mark Newby: "Re: recommendation on an exploit and malicious software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Luke Vogel <luke@bell-bird.com.au> Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 16:07:16 +1000
Andrew wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on an assignment on analysis of an exploit and malicious
> software on platform NT or Linux --- not any famous one, must be something
> new, any recommendations?
>
> Thank you,
Why not do an analysis of a worm like nimda (win), code red(win),
ramen(linux) or 1i0n(linux). They are all relatively recent and well
documented now. If you want something "VERY NEW" see what you can find
on the klez worm.
good luck with your assignment.
-- Regards Luke ------ Q: What does FAQ stand for? A: We are Frequently Asked this Question, and we have no idea. ------ C.O.L.S FAQ - http://www.linuxsecurity.com/docs/colsfaq.html Note: Remove NOSPAM from my return address if necessary ------
- Next message: svek: "Re: Why is BSD more secure?"
- Previous message: John Oakes: "Re: Certificate Server"
- In reply to: Andrew: "recommendation on an exploit and malicious software"
- Next in thread: Mark Newby: "Re: recommendation on an exploit and malicious software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
