Re: setuid not?
From: xp@idsignet.spammer-eat-shit.comDate: 06/20/02
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Is there a new DNS exploit?"
- Previous message: Ian Jones: "Re: linux kernel patch against probe"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: setuid not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: xp@idsignet.spammer-eat-shit.com Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:20:15 -0700
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:13:04 +0200
Kasper Dupont <kasperd@daimi.au.dk> wrote:
> Fox Morrey wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> > There may be a really dumb answer to this, but I can't find it..
> > I have a program (compiled), such as:
> > -rwsrwsrwx 1 root root 511021 Jun 19 20:38 voxcd.4ge
> ^ ^^ ^^ ^^^^
>
> How do you dare posting something like that to a security group?
Personally, I'd rather have people post questions deemed "stupid"
by some self-proclaimed gurus, than having them pretend to know
something about security and have a nasty big hole on their
system.
I mean, if the guy knows everything about Linux security already,
he wouldn't be asking questions here, would he?
Besides, setuid issue can be very confusing for some new users
(even old ones). I know, I know, he should RTFM, but it does not
cost that much to point out the problem nicely in a reply,
does it?
rgds
xp
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Is there a new DNS exploit?"
- Previous message: Ian Jones: "Re: linux kernel patch against probe"
- In reply to: Kasper Dupont: "Re: setuid not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
