Re: Possible attack scenario
From: RainbowHat (nHiATlE@blSackholeP.mAit.edMu.invalid)Date: 04/15/02
- Next message: RainbowHat: "Re: Possible attack scenario"
- Previous message: James Riden: "Re: Questions Regarding Workable SOHO Windows Installation / Configuration, Diagnostics, & Security Options ver. 2.03 ~ several Kb Please follow up in comp.security.misc"
- In reply to: Todd Urie: "Possible attack scenario"
- Next in thread: RainbowHat: "Re: Possible attack scenario"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: RainbowHat <nHiATlE@blSackholeP.mAit.edMu.invalid> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:24:43 +0000 (UTC)
[Part 1]
< Todd Urie
>I have a Redhat 7.2 system installed with firewall using iptables. My
>iptables setup logs all packets that are dropped by the firewall.
Looks for me you don't drop but just loged according to the name "IN:".
>Since I
>have had the logging enabled, I have seen what appears to be an attempted
>attack scenario. I was wondering if this was really the case or am I just
>seeing something 'normal'.
I guess this is a global load balancers traffics that measure round trip
time except SYN packet coming from 12.251.159.195 at 14:11.
My global load balancers scenario:
1) ICMP echo request.
2) UDP port 53.
3) TCP ACK-SYN port 53. measure round trip time.
8<
>Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
Welcome.
>I am trying to learn what to look for and what to ignore.
Yes, you should decide your security policy.
-- Regards, RainbowHat. To spoof or not to spoof, that is the packet. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Volume is not precision You need to be precise and informative. This end is not served by simply dumping huge volumes of code or data into a help request. If you have a large, complicated test case that is breaking a program, try to trim it and make it as small as possible. ----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7
- Next message: RainbowHat: "Re: Possible attack scenario"
- Previous message: James Riden: "Re: Questions Regarding Workable SOHO Windows Installation / Configuration, Diagnostics, & Security Options ver. 2.03 ~ several Kb Please follow up in comp.security.misc"
- In reply to: Todd Urie: "Possible attack scenario"
- Next in thread: RainbowHat: "Re: Possible attack scenario"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|