Re: Linux FTP Security
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia (nkadel@bellatlantic.net)Date: 04/10/02
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Gotta love the server access logs!"
- Previous message: martinius: "Attack?: strange packets with 0.0.0.0 source and various destination IPs and ports"
- In reply to: Travis Casey: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Next in thread: Travis Casey: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Reply: Travis Casey: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Reply: Cameron L. Spitzer: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel@bellatlantic.net> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 03:14:48 GMT
"Travis Casey" <efindel@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:he209a.fp.ln@titan.tobara.org...
> Stephan Göldi wrote:
>
> >> 3. Even if you chroot all of your users, you should still NOT use ftp
> >> to control the filesystem. Use SSH and scp, sftp ext... they are
> >> encrypted and secured. Allowing root to login to the ftp server is
> >> never a good idea.
> >
> > And how about micros~1.oft users? Do they know what sftp and scp are?
>
> Usually not, but, contrary to rumor, many MS users are at least somewhat
> trainable. ;-) For them, there's a free SSH client package called
> "PuTTY", which includes SSH, SFTP, and SCP.
And for those who prefer a nice GUI for transferring files as opposed to the
horrid missing ftp commands of sftp (such as mput and mget), there is
WinSCP2.
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Gotta love the server access logs!"
- Previous message: martinius: "Attack?: strange packets with 0.0.0.0 source and various destination IPs and ports"
- In reply to: Travis Casey: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Next in thread: Travis Casey: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Reply: Travis Casey: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Reply: Cameron L. Spitzer: "Re: Linux FTP Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|