Re: the word "constraints" in security policy

From: Adaptrx (adaptr@adaptr.xs4all.nl)
Date: 03/20/02

  • Next message: citizen: "Re: why so many "potential buffer overflow" alerts?" 

    From: "Adaptrx" <adaptr@adaptr.xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 03:57:49 +0100

    "Tim Haynes" <usenet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk> wrote in message
    news:861yegzb3q.fsf@potato.vegetable.org.uk...
    > >
    > > Over to you , Tim.
    >
    > I think my answer was less informative, albeit more subtly formulated ;8)
    >

    Ah ! But which is the more praiseworthy goal ?
    To be concise and witty, or to be blandly destructive and yet _complete_ ?
    My ego requires me to say : the latter, o'course...
    But honesty would have me add : I'm not much for subtlety these days...

    Although I must say...
    If your response meant ALL THAT and was short 'n' sweet as well, phew !
    BTW who IS Ann Summers, and what does her catalogue have to do with Linux
    (if anything) ?
    NOTE I'm neither an Englishman nor any other English-speaking native... erm
    native English-speaker...

    Heh it occurs to me (now) that I even gave him (the OPer) an answer : go
    find an NT newsgroup.

    • Quantcast