Re: U.S. export laws on SSH/SSL?
From: Bill Unruh (unruh@physics.ubc.ca)Date: 03/19/02
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: U.S. export laws on SSH/SSL?"
- Previous message: Michael Erskine: "Re: Back Orifice for Unix flaw emerges from obscurity"
- In reply to: Edward Lee: "U.S. export laws on SSH/SSL?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: unruh@physics.ubc.ca (Bill Unruh) Date: 19 Mar 2002 05:40:52 GMT
In <e48c1efe.0203161110.54df074@posting.google.com> epl@linnix.com (Edward Lee) writes:
]Is anyone familar with U.S. export laws on encryptions? If I place a
]server oversea and manage it with SSH/SSL, am I breaking the laws?
]How do I generate an exportable SSH/SSL? The docs descript a way to
]pick the encryption scheme, but what are needed for exports. I know
]that we are in a backward country, but we have to try to follow stupid
]laws.
Nothing you read on the net is legal advice. If the courts decide you
have broken the law, it is you, not the internet advisers who will
server the time.
Export of freely available "public domain" software is free of export
controls. So, use openssh/openssl.
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: U.S. export laws on SSH/SSL?"
- Previous message: Michael Erskine: "Re: Back Orifice for Unix flaw emerges from obscurity"
- In reply to: Edward Lee: "U.S. export laws on SSH/SSL?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
