Re: SSH question!??!
From: Tim Haynes (usenet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk)Date: 03/13/02
- Next message: Michael Heiming: "Re: openssh"
- Previous message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: trying to set-up and configure iptables"
- In reply to: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: SSH question!??!"
- Next in thread: Zoro: "SSH Version Banner"
- Next in thread: MM: "Re: SSH question!??!"
- Reply: Zoro: "SSH Version Banner"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Tim Haynes <usenet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 23:14:51 +0000
Dragan Cvetkovic <d1r2a3g4a5n.NOSPAM@soli99ton.com> writes:
>> > Remember also that all OpenSSH versions use zlib, which has just been
>> > shown to have a problem.
>>
>> Does that mean we have to upgrade to 3.2?
>
> I though that zlib is dynamically linked to ssh (at least on my Debian
> system), so upgrading /usr/lib/libz.so.1 should be enough. Or am I wrong?
I had this thought as well; from what I saw on debian-secure as well,
dynamically linked against libz is fine, it's statically linked packages
that have problems.
I thought the OpenSSH vulnerability was a separate affair; see
<http://www.openbsd.org/advisories/ssh_channelalloc.txt> for more.
~Tim
-- Rushing onwards, tracing the chains, |piglet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk Chasing the days, chasing the days. |http://spodzone.org.uk/
- Next message: Michael Heiming: "Re: openssh"
- Previous message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: trying to set-up and configure iptables"
- In reply to: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: SSH question!??!"
- Next in thread: Zoro: "SSH Version Banner"
- Next in thread: MM: "Re: SSH question!??!"
- Reply: Zoro: "SSH Version Banner"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
