Re: Possible PASV port theft
From: Ashok Aiyar (aiyar@ebv.mimnet.northwestern.edu)Date: 02/27/02
- Next message: Wojtek Walczak: "Re: preventing ping"
- Previous message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Help with system attack"
- In reply to: gaius.petronius: "Re: Possible PASV port theft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Ashok Aiyar <aiyar@ebv.mimnet.northwestern.edu> Date: 27 Feb 2002 17:07:54 GMT
On 26 Feb 2002 23:44:56 -0800,
gaius.petronius (rut@linuxmail.org) wrote:
> Has anyone heard whether any ftp implementations need a udp connection
> on port 20,21 in addition to tcp?
Not if it is RFC compliant.
However, several years ago, when the datagram based FSP protocol was
still used, many FSP daemons bound to UDP port 21 by default.
Ashok
-- Ashok Aiyar RLU #51601
- Next message: Wojtek Walczak: "Re: preventing ping"
- Previous message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Help with system attack"
- In reply to: gaius.petronius: "Re: Possible PASV port theft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
