Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?
From: RainbowHat (nHiATlE@blSackholeP.mAit.edMu.invalid)Date: 02/11/02
- Previous message: Jerzy Wolinski: "Re: ftp & ipchains: using the chains approach this time"
- In reply to: RainbowHat: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Next in thread: RainbowHat: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Reply: Jem Berkes: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: RainbowHat <nHiATlE@blSackholeP.mAit.edMu.invalid> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:52:37 +0000 (UTC)
< RainbowHat
8<
>x.x.x.x:26344 WINDOW=0, TCP flags NULL?, spoofed SRC=130.179.134.23
> | 3hops
> V
>157.130.91.153:ICMP3,1[] ID=0
> | .
> | 15hops V
> | 24.229.129.72:28051 unreached
> V
>130.179.134.23:ICMP
>
>157.130.91.153 was sitting between x.x.x.x and 24.229.129.72.
>The x.x.x.x spoofed SRC=130.179.134.23 because how many hops wasn't
>symmetry (3 : 15 hops).
>If there were not crafted and my passive fingerprint DB is not too
>obsolete. AFAIK Solaris or Linux reply ICMP [] quoted error message.
> 157.130.91.153 : Cisco IOS, Solaris or Linux
> x.x.x.x : Solaris or compromised Solaris (dtspcd exploit?)
If 157.130.91.153 is Cisco 12000 series router, the offender attacked
router. They known that 24.229.129.72 don't exist. They flooded spoofed
SRC TCP packets to non-existed host 24.229.129.72 sitting 3 hops away
from 157.130.91.153. Jem and ujay observed ICMP backscatter traffic.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/GSR-unreachables-pub.shtml
|The performance of Cisco 12000 series routers can be degraded when
|they have to send a large number of ICMP Unreachable packets....
|the processing of the replies can saturate the CPU....Exploitation of
|this vulnerabilities may lead to the Denial-of-Service. The router's
|performance will degrade and, in the worst case scenario, the router
|will stop forwarding packets.
-- Best Regards, RainbowHat. I support FULL DISCLOSURE. ----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7
- Next message: TCF Cranendonk: "iptables forwarding"
- Previous message: Jerzy Wolinski: "Re: ftp & ipchains: using the chains approach this time"
- In reply to: RainbowHat: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Next in thread: Jem Berkes: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Next in thread: RainbowHat: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Reply: Jem Berkes: "Re: ICMP type 3, an attack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|