Re: firewall securing outgoing traffic?
From: Alexander (aldem-news@news.aldem.net)Date: 02/05/02
- Next message: Alexander: "Re: crypted file system 2.4 ?"
- Previous message: Cedric Blancher: "Re: --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED (was: Re: POP-before-SMTP/log2db/RH 6.2/Sendmail 8.11/Cyrus-SASL)"
- Maybe in reply to: Zaphod Beeblebrox: "Re: firewall securing outgoing traffic?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Alexander" <aldem-news@news.aldem.net> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:28:37 +0100
"Dimitri Maziuk" <dima@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> Keep in mind that there aren't any trojan programs for Linux
> to speak of: 1) OS security makes it hard for them to do
> real damage (you must run the trojan as root, otherwise it
> won't be able to access the important stuff),
Hmm... "OS security"? Which one? :) Novice users, and most home
users run their system as root anyway, so... Or how can you explain
thousand of owned/hacked Linux systems around the world?
> chances of success are higher. This is oversimplyfing quite a
> bit, but the point is, trojans and viruses are not a very big
> problem on Linux ATM.
Really? See note above. A lot of hacked Linux boxes.
> Secondly, a program can e.g. lie to ZA about its name. So
> setting up firewall rules on per-program basis is not all
> that foolproof, either.
Aha... Lie... Embed into kernel, modify it, etc... Trojan OS, eh? :)
Well. It _can_ be done on misconfigure (or not configured) system,
but if you know what to do, on WinNT/2K/XP it just cannot happen
(forget about W95/98/ME - this is DOS with GUI).
> Sorry, Unix/Linux philosophy is that your brain works much better
> than any code, so you're supposed to use it.
That's common sense, and (IMHO) has nothing to do with Linux/UNIX :)
If you can use your brain - it will work everywhere, isn't?
OTOH, clerks and pizza-boys (who do work with computers) are not supposed
to go so far - to understand how computers work and why. They just use it.
You don't need to _know_ what is inside if you can use it (cars, for
instance).
> The downside is that there's a steep learning curve, esp. in the beginning.
OTGH, it
> really *does* work better than a computer program.
But slower as well. You can't know everything - so it won't work better for
everyone. That's why we have doctors, for instance - because not everyone
can
help himself :)
/Al
- Next message: Alexander: "Re: crypted file system 2.4 ?"
- Previous message: Cedric Blancher: "Re: --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED (was: Re: POP-before-SMTP/log2db/RH 6.2/Sendmail 8.11/Cyrus-SASL)"
- Maybe in reply to: Zaphod Beeblebrox: "Re: firewall securing outgoing traffic?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|