Re: Number of iptables rules before performance hit

From: Tim Haynes (usenet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk)
Date: 01/07/02 

From: Tim Haynes <usenet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk>
Date: 07 Jan 2002 10:39:57 +0000

osiris@deltaville.net (Michael Erskine) writes:

> > Bingo. This is why I made my comment about being telepathic concerning the
> > nature of noise on his network. If you want to know how something is going
> > to behave, get the heck on with measuring it yaself, don't ask me to guess.
> >
> > Still, no accounting for delicate sensibilities, is there?
>
> My dear friend....
>
> You are caustic, blunt, and *rarely* a bit insulting... a man after me
> own heart... never-the-less go find that "Blarney Stone"...

<chuckle> Yes, I've had a good weekend of dealings with bad drivers,
tolerable insurance companies, closed garages, banks that kill all your
standing orders without authorization, ...

> If I didn't wish I could visit the local pub w' ye. I'd a neer' said
> it.
>
> :)

Mine's a diet coke. :8)

~Tim 

-- 
Not every discomfort should                 |piglet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk
be criminalised. (Bill Unruh)               |http://spodzone.org.uk/