Re: portmap needed ?
From: bruce (losthalo@Bast.debian.org)Date: 12/31/01
- Next message: J. Reilink: "Re: My Redhat 7.0 has been hacked, again! Help!"
- Previous message: Ian Jones: "Re: My Redhat 7.0 has been hacked, again! Help!"
- Maybe in reply to: Cameron L. Spitzer: "portmap needed ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: losthalo@Bast.debian.org (bruce) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 16:23:50 GMT
In article <slrna311b4.p99.hal@feenix.burgiss.net>, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>Not AFAIK...certainly not unless there is some app running that uses
>both.
>> The netbase/portmapper.txt.gz says
>> "If you kill the portmap process without saving its tables you will have
>> to reboot the machine." Why? What are they talking about?
>Dunno, but if you shut it down properly, this is not a problem. Use
>whatever tools your distro has for stopping services.
I'm running a Debian Slink system, and regularly kill my portmapper with
kill -9, and have never seen any problems.
However, I'm interested in removing it from the boot scripts, so that I don't
need it for anything. Any advice on how to go about this?
Bruce
losthalo{at}nerg.net
- Next message: J. Reilink: "Re: My Redhat 7.0 has been hacked, again! Help!"
- Previous message: Ian Jones: "Re: My Redhat 7.0 has been hacked, again! Help!"
- Maybe in reply to: Cameron L. Spitzer: "portmap needed ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|