Re: small linux firewall/router advice
From: Yan Seiner (yan@oberon.cardinal.lan)Date: 12/29/01
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Newbie: Help with home machine surveillance"
- Previous message: Tim Haynes: "Re: What are these services ?"
- In reply to: andrew somerville: "Re: small linux firewall/router advice"
- Next in thread: Daniel Barron: "Re: small linux firewall/router advice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Yan Seiner" <yan@oberon.cardinal.lan> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:18:54 -0500
It's really a bad idea to depend on security through obscurity.
Your success depends on how much time you spend connected. While your
machine may not be up long enough to do any real damage, getting
compromised is a major pain in the ass - requiring basically a new
install.
I run a wan of several dial-ups that are up 24-7 and each is firewalled,
on each interface. The main server is firewalled on the WAN interfaces as
well as the local network interface.
I find that I get several attempts / day by script kiddies for some kind
of exploit. Why take chances?
Besides which, ipchains/iptables is fun - you learn A LOT about how each
service works. Stretching your mind keeps you young - and that's becoming
more and more important at my age :-)
--Yan
In article <JbXW7.48759$US4.8468158@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>,
"andrew somerville" <aj.somerville@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> I've also used a standard dial up connection with no firewall for over
> 18 months with no problems i.e. security problems. Andy
>
>
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: Newbie: Help with home machine surveillance"
- Previous message: Tim Haynes: "Re: What are these services ?"
- In reply to: andrew somerville: "Re: small linux firewall/router advice"
- Next in thread: Daniel Barron: "Re: small linux firewall/router advice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|