Re: firewalling off the world?
From: Tim Haynes (usenet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk)Date: 12/26/01
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: Restricting su to SSH sessions"
- Previous message: Tim Haynes: "Re: What are these services ?"
- In reply to: Walter Dnes: "Re: firewalling off the world?"
- Next in thread: JimM: "Re: firewalling off the world?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Tim Haynes <usenet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk> Date: 26 Dec 2001 16:21:10 +0000
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> writes:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 19:00:48 -0500, John Doe, <expires2002@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Ian reacted a bit emotionally. Let's try a more cold calculated
> response...
Hmmmm.
> This does *NOT* increase your security by a factor of 3. If your system
> is insecure to begin with, it'll get cracked by a "domestic" machine. If
> you have vulnerability X, the first attempt will compromise your machine.
> Having 100 attempts rather than 400 attempts won't really make any
> difference. If it's secure, it won't get cracked, regardless of the
> number of attempts.
Quite so. Only 1 probe is needed, 100 or 400 makes stuff-all difference.
The question still remains, why should discrimination against country by
IP# be either (a) on-topic for cols or (b) tolerated?
~Tim
-- Bag*** gave a big yawn, |piglet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk and settled down to sleep. |http://spodzone.org.uk/
- Next message: Jem Berkes: "Re: Restricting su to SSH sessions"
- Previous message: Tim Haynes: "Re: What are these services ?"
- In reply to: Walter Dnes: "Re: firewalling off the world?"
- Next in thread: JimM: "Re: firewalling off the world?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]