Re: firewalling off the world?
From: JimM (nomail@aol.com)Date: 12/23/01
- Next message: Michael Erskine: "Re: Linux vulnerability."
- Previous message: Joel Hammer: "Re: Linux fsav virus?"
- In reply to: John Doe: "Re: firewalling off the world?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: JimM <nomail@aol.com> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 01:56:04 GMT
In article <Lz6V7.563$bb6.96555@newsfeed.slurp.net>, expires2002
@hotmail.com says...
> "Ian Jones" <ian@dsl081-056-052.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net> wrote in message
> news:m3ofkrdxwb.fsf@mobile.lan...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
That is cold, hard and logical. Precisely the way one should administer
a logical system in an imperfect world. I'm sure I will be flamed for
supporting your views but logic is logic. You must however draw a
relationship between hacks and hits vs. "profit" (be that $ or uptime).
It would not be logical to deny that 5% access if it provides 90% of
income. Unless the hacks it prevents would have cost >90% income.
-- Thanks, JimM
- Next message: Michael Erskine: "Re: Linux vulnerability."
- Previous message: Joel Hammer: "Re: Linux fsav virus?"
- In reply to: John Doe: "Re: firewalling off the world?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
