Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: "Sebastian G." <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:08:57 +0100
SafeBoot Simon wrote:
BTW, why exactly should I presume that you, who is obviously abusing a .NET
infected MSIE as a webbrowser, had any clue about security?
very true, I guess that being a windows user I indeed have no right
whatsoever to claim any competence.
Now this guess only proves how clueless you are, since at least the kernel and the core APIs of the Windows NT line are C2 conform implementations of discretionary access control.
> I guess I've been lucky not to get caught out as such an obvious fraud
> for so long,
I doubt that this even holds. Any reasonable person would as well, since effectively mounting a remote shell to every website you visit clearly is a horribly stupid thing.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: SafeBoot Simon
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- References:
- Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: mjknudse
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: mjknudse
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: Todd H.
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: SafeBoot Simon
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: SafeBoot Simon
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- From: SafeBoot Simon
- Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- Prev by Date: Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- Next by Date: Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- Previous by thread: Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- Next by thread: Re: Safteboot 5b010019 error then 92h
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|