Re: MD5 Alive?
- From: "Sebastian G." <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:48:09 +0200
Unruh wrote:
Running the Digest on itself say upwards of 1000 times is -- in the
circles that I've been in kind of an accepted thing to do.
Really bad idea. On each level, you loose about as he says, 1/e outputs.
This would mean you loose about 0.66 bits per iteration, so after 194 iterations you would have created a unique collision...
Ie, aftr 1000 times,. you will have only something like 1/e^1000 unique
outputs.
You assume that the iterations are independent. However, for MD5 you're very likely not not stumble upon an additional collision after the first iteration. This is a property inherited by the design.
(I am sure it is more than that, but lets stick with the random
mapping assumption).
Be careful about your assumptions.
.
- References:
- MD5 Alive?
- From: JuiceMan
- Re: MD5 Alive?
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: MD5 Alive?
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: MD5 Alive?
- From: JuiceMan
- Re: MD5 Alive?
- From: Unruh
- MD5 Alive?
- Prev by Date: Re: MD5 Alive?
- Next by Date: Model OSI
- Previous by thread: Re: MD5 Alive?
- Next by thread: Computer Forensics
- Index(es):