Re: Win2k Netstat sockets interpretation
- From: warf <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:15:39 GMT
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
warf wrote:snip diatribe and gratuitous snarling....
I have been trying to learn as much as I can about internet 'security'
to get a better feeling for what data is leaving my home,
Eh... is that any serious problem at all?
Yes, if you have, or ever did have, any media on your system, or if you realize the RIAA and ilk will someday get the legal club to go after 'other' citizens for $750USD/title, or even if you are just fed up with surreptitious datamining for unstated purposes. or if subversion of your
connection for nepharious purposes is 'problematic: then,YES.
>> BUT, netstat /a indicates netbios ports 137,138,139,445 listening
See, you didn't learn anything. You didn't even disable the SMB binding and
the NetBIOS bindings. And this even when some clever guys already collected
an easily understandable overview on websites like
<http://ntsvcfg.de/ntsvcfg_eng.html>.
I said I was "trying"....never claimed to 'know'. better ishould be like
the rest of the cattle and pretend it is not really going to affect me?
By making an effort to learn I take responsibility...you have been helpful..even if grumpy.
snip.......
when I allow ZA to allow T-bird to act as a server
Restated "When I run T-bird ZA tells me T-bird wants to access the internet and act as a server.
I have deleted "file and print sharing" under "internet connections and disbled most recognizable "remote access" services under 'services.msc' but ZA detects a few remote access modules running and gives them permission if select "OK" to the suggested query.
AND
For eg; If I allow scvhost to access 0.0.0.0 when firefox2.0 opens i notice randomly ports assigned to urls or ip addresss.
and firefox always has 4 connections local and 4 remote open inaddition
to the url i am browsing????
*repeating the thousandth time*
'netstat' on Win2K provides a view on the state of the *TDI interface*, not
the actual TCP/IP sockeets. The TDI interface has different semantics, and
something appearing as 0.0.0.0 listening means "an outstanding request to
open a TCP/IP connection", thus no actual TCP/IP socket in LISTENING state.
If you had just take the simplest measures to actualy verify such bogus
open ports with a port scan, you'd have found them closed.
Iam using Ethereal and there is traffic...I am 'learning' but it is a very complex topic ...for non-pro's like me...but that is why i ask.
but Akamaitech~ is frequently there
Wow... Windows Automatic Updates... the mysterious of technology aren't to
be believed !!!11
no, WINUPDATE is manual...I reassembled the TCP/IP strream and saw in one instance it was a ZA update. This concurrs with the stated utility of those servers. I read conflicting ideas as to the scope of the AKAMAI servers and wondered why I would be 'uploading' to them as well...with optout selected for all products 'satisfaction' reports.
I have checked many netstat resources to no avail...help?
MSDN... Ah, might just be better to get a replacement which works like the
real netstat command, f.e. TcpView from Sysinternals^W Microsoft.
Now I have to spracken ze duetch. That is exactly what i needed but the launguage for the links is all german!!! Damn.
Breifly: How does one interpret the 'listening', 'waiting', 'established' and all the other port information netstat lists? The only
one I get is one with a 'foreign' ip and 'established'...those are actual internet connections right?
Eastlink is very coy and stingy with 'what services and ports I require'
info...so I am trying to learn thru you and int-resources.
Thanks for that helpful link...wish I spoke enough german to decipher it!
Warf.
.
- References:
- Win2k Netstat sockets interpretation
- From: warf
- Win2k Netstat sockets interpretation
- Prev by Date: Win2k Netstat sockets interpretation
- Previous by thread: Win2k Netstat sockets interpretation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|