Re: Best Spam / Phishing Filter

From: MC <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:34:49 +0100

Colin B. wrote:

The best solution is a good travel budget and a box of bullets. Once 50
or 100 spammers show up murdered in an identical manner, the profits might
not seem so promising.

Otherwise, it's just a race condition.

This is why I do spam-filtering in a central location if at all possible. Spammers get ahead, update one thing on one system and all the clients using it will be up to speed with the new condition.

.

References:
- Best Spam / Phishing Filter
  - From: blah
- Re: Best Spam / Phishing Filter
  - From: Colin B.

Prev by Date: Re: Recent word exploit also causes problems in OpenOffice
Next by Date: Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Previous by thread: Re: Best Spam / Phishing Filter
Next by thread: bestcrypt 7.20 vs drivecrypt 4.4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Update: Messenger Spam
... >that their profits are decreasing because their aggressive tactics have ... >forced the consumer to delete them with anti spam software, ... Not just on pop-up spammers. ...
(comp.security.firewalls)
Re: Update: Messenger Spam
... >that their profits are decreasing because their aggressive tactics have ... >forced the consumer to delete them with anti spam software, ... Not just on pop-up spammers. ...
(microsoft.public.win2000.security)