Re: Protecting the Operating System
- From: Nomen Nescio <nobody@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:00:18 +0200 (CEST)
Vanguard wrote:
"TwistyCreek" <anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8MG587OS38989.526412037@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Vanguard wrote:
God forbid the OP just gets a padlock ...
<snip>
Please feel free to take as much time as you need to go back and
read
what the OP plainly stated in his first post. We're happy to wait
for
slower readers here. :)
Stop smoking those mushrooms. The OP never addressed physically
securing his computer while still allowing free access to it.
ROTFLMAO!
Ok, now amuse us all by trying to explain how "free access" and
"physical security" aren't polar opposites.
.
- References:
- Re: Protecting the Operating System
- From: Vanguard
- Re: Protecting the Operating System
- From: TwistyCreek
- Re: Protecting the Operating System
- From: Vanguard
- Re: Protecting the Operating System
- Prev by Date: Re: Protecting the Operating System
- Next by Date: Re: Bios Passwords
- Previous by thread: Re: Protecting the Operating System
- Next by thread: Re: Protecting the Operating System
- Index(es):