Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: sam
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 18:33:57 -0700
On Tue, 02 May 2006 17:16:52 -0600, Notan
<notan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
donnie wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2006 21:54:08 +0100, "Ant" <not@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's less distracting, but not needed at all. The correct way to_______________________________________
separate what you write from what you quote is to leave a blank line,
just as I've done here. You should also have snipped the sig.
That's as far as I'm going.
You continue to do something that you *know* annoys people.
Doesn't say much for you, does it?
Notan
you guys really are full of yourselves. ever hear of freedom ?
.
- References:
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: donnie
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: me
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: Todd H.
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: donnie
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: Ant
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: donnie
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- From: Notan
- Re: Whole OS encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Defender ?
- Next by Date: Re: U.S. Pressures ISPs on Data Retention
- Previous by thread: Re: Whole OS encryption
- Next by thread: Re: Whole OS encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|