Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- From: optikl <optik-mechanik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:09:51 -0600
Sean Heeger wrote:
Man, just lighten up people. Can't you see that an apology was given? I swear this thread sucks for the fact that some little person just has to have the final downswing in taking a sledgehammer to an ant. Move on!
By the way, I did download an evaluation of the ZeroSpyware v3.4 today and have been hitting it pretty hard on my testing platform. It gets 5 stars. If you guys were on the Mind of Mancia show, Carlos would give you a big Dee-Dee-Dee.
sean
Sean, the issue isn't whether or not the program is 5 stars, the issue is that there are more credible ways to promote your product. If every software vendor in the world stopped by to pimp their wares, this and other related newsgroups would look like a Baghdad flea-market on a Sunday afternoon. Besides, what's wrong with paying for advertising? It's a cost of doing business.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- From: Sean Heeger
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- References:
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- From: optikl
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- From: Moe Trin
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- From: zerospyware_enterprise
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- From: Moe Trin
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- From: Sean Heeger
- Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- Prev by Date: Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- Next by Date: Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- Previous by thread: Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- Next by thread: Re: ZeroSpyware Enterprise Evaluation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|