Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: cypher <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:46:09 +0000 (UTC)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"nemo_outis" <abc@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:Xns9765C6C7F5051abcxyzcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Those who wish to further examine the question of whether MD5 is
broken or not should scan the current thread on sci.crypt
called:
HMAC-MD5 shown not compromized by MD5 collisions
Yes, you have right. The problem is that not all utilities are
using HMAC algorithms for e.g. key derivation, and HMAC can't be
used everywhere.
We have good alternatives, so why we should not use them? We have
*no* benefit from using MD5, so why stick to it? It doesn't matter
if it is completly broken or not. SHA1 is much stronger than MD5,
and we will still move to better hash functions.
Regards,
cypher
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQ+3qSyPnLg7nPH4AEQLnmQCgqgC9CsAmI/bF75sC0Xy+/n6tAUgAnRGR
PJMOHrH64z/ZkALFaxz3aNWu
=Xfwm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
- References:
- NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: ~David~
- Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: nemo_outis
- Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: ~David~
- Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: nemo_outis
- Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: lgr_joly
- Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: nemo_outis
- Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- From: nemo_outis
- NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- Prev by Date: Did I phrase my question wrong?
- Next by Date: Re: Backup of Outlook?
- Previous by thread: Re: NSA "telephone monitoring" program
- Next by thread: Rootkit Revealer's helpfile calling out?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|