Re: What are the Security Implications of Pay Per Mail
- From: Notan <notan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:10:07 -0700
Jim Watt wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:55:51 -0700, Notan
<notan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tedrichardson9925@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
AOL and Yahoo plan to allow businesses to bypass their Spam filters.
Will criminal Spam gangs find a way to better target people because of
this?
Does it surprise anyone, that a piece of shit organization like AOL,
would do something like this, for money?
It surprises me. The main thing both have going for themselves is
spam filtering.
I suspect the story is bollocks from someone who does not like
either company.
While AOL and Yahoo might have *incoming* spam filters,
they've done nothing to slow the flow of crap originating
from their users.
Notan
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Backup
- Next by Date: Re: What are the Security Implications of Pay Per Mail
- Previous by thread: Re: What are the Security Implications of Pay Per Mail
- Next by thread: Re: What are the Security Implications of Pay Per Mail
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|