Re: Port forwarding/open ports?
- From: Winged <Winged@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:05:30 -0600
AV wrote:
To be able for another person to connect to my Netmeeting (conf.exe)in Windows XP and share applications I would need to open the ports 1720 and 1503 in my router firewall.
My wonder is how much more vulnerable I will be if I do that? It would be nice not to have to open and close those ports over and over again in my router firewall when I need it and instead having them open all the time so it will just be to start Netmeeting when I need to collaborate and share applications.
- Is it just a risk (bigger or smaller?) when I have Netmeeting started since I suppose some good hacker would need an application that actually listens to those open ports to be able to do anything? If I normally don't have Netmeeting started I suppose the ports could just as well be open in my router all the time?
- If it is a risk as described above, what if I create a rule in my software firewall that blocks those two ports on the computer in my LAN to which the ports are forwarded? It is quicker for me to put that rule on and off in my software firewall than to open and close the ports in the router.
- These same questions above goes for the one port one can choose to have open in the router to give the best possible chances for good sound quality for Skype IP calls. How risky or not is it to have a few ports open in you router firewall?
Some ports have to be open to operate.
It's as risky as the software exposes the system to.
I frequently use dynamically open ports by scripting the open an close in batch file that call the program in question.
For example skype has the following vulnerabilities listed:
Search Advisory, Vulnerability, and Virus Database
Search: [Advanced Search]
All Content Secunia Advisories Virus Information
View full vulnerability report for a specific product: - Skype for Linux 0.x - Skype for Linux 1.x - Skype for Mac OS X 0.x - Skype for Mac OS X 1.x - Skype for Pocket PC 1.x - Skype for Windows 1.x
Found: 3 Secunia Security Advisories, displaying 1-3
Sort by: Match, Title, Date
Title Date Skype Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities 2005-10-25 Skype "skype_profile.jpg" Insecure Temporary File Creation 2005-07-18 Skype "callto:" URI Handler Buffer Overflow Vulnerability 2004-11-15
Found: 5 Viruses, displaying 1-5
W32/Mytob.gr@MM
....Suspended. We've got something we would like to share with you. Skype for Windows 1.4 - Have you got the new Skype? What is...
Report from McAfee. On 19th Oct 2005.
W32.Fanbot.A@mm
....ort@[RECIPIENT MAIL DOMAIN] Subject: One of the following: Share Skype. What is Skype? Skype for Windows 1.4 - Have you got...
Report from Symantec. On 17th Oct 2005.
Samony.A
....ionally, Samony.A spreads via email in a message that deals with Skype , which is a telephony over IP program. Visible Sympt...
Report from Panda Antivirus. On 26th Oct 2005.
W32.Looksky.A@mm
....e firewall settings. Distribution Subject of email : Skylook for Skype Name of attachment : skylook_1.exe Size of attachment...
Report from Symantec. On 25th Oct 2005.
W32.Mytob.ML@mm
....ed, it performs the following actions: Copies itself as %System%\skype32.exe. Note: %System% is a variable that refers to th...
Report from Symantec. On 3rd Dec 2005.
(from secunia http://secunia.com/search/?search=skype)
All software opens the vulnerability window. Many factors including the software contol the danger to the local system. It depends if the benefits outweigh the risk of use.
Not sure I have helped much but understand everything you use to communicate on the web increases your risk of compromise. How a tool is used (user behaviour) can significantly increase that risk. Opening unknown executables, and communicating with unknown people always increases the risk.
Winged .
- References:
- Port forwarding/open ports?
- From: AV
- Port forwarding/open ports?
- Prev by Date: Re: AFTER Computers; What's Next?
- Next by Date: Re: Bugs and Bugs...get rid of them
- Previous by thread: Re: Port forwarding/open ports?
- Next by thread: Re: AFTER Computers; What's Next?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|