Re: Is Microsoft serious?
- From: Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:55:01 -0700 (MST)
> The question is not that every OS has security problems. The statement I
> have made, and others also, is that Microsoft is the KING of bad software
> riddled with security problems. You seem to try the old lame EXCUSE of
> popularity causes the number of security holes. BULLSHIT.
I hate to be the one to tell you this in the middle of a perfectly good
Microsoft bashing session, but if you were to actually sit back and take
stock of the number of known Windows vulnerabilities versus the number of
known Linux vulnerabilities, you'd find that Linus usually has at lease as
many if not MORE holes than Windows.
What's bullshit is the notion that Microsoft is more (quantitatively)
buggy than any other common operating system in the first place. That's a
myth that perpetrated on people who don't know any better, by talking
Where the two "classes" of operating systems generally diverge, if they
diverge at all, is the severity of a given bug. In the multiuser world of
*nix it's not enough to just break out of a piece of running code. You
usually have to escalate privileges to do any real damage. With Windows
administrative accounts being a patched together and stapled on thing,
it's either trivial to gain admin access, or simply breaking a piece of
code will give it to you by default.
And... you hear more about Windows defects because Windows is more
popular. Not to mention the fact that every script kiddie out there is
gunning for it because it's popular. Real computer criminals go after *nix
boxes because they're more useful. The kiddies go after win* boxen because
all they really want is another bot. And they usually do it from a .nix
box. So yes, part of the myth that Win* is more buggy than *nix is due to
By the way, I'm sitting at a *nix box on an all *nix network at the
moment. I wouldn't have my personal stuff running anything else. :) While
*nix boxes are more buggy, and more popular with the real dangerous
critters out there, they're still easier to harden, maintain securely, and
operate efficiently if you know what you're doing. And the patches
generally do come a lot faster so the bugs aren't quite so long lived.
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Microsoft serious?
- Next by Date: AVG Anti-virus and ZoneAlarms
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Microsoft serious?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Microsoft serious?