Re: Truecrypt 4.1
From: Ari Silverstein (abcarisilversteinn_at_yahoo.comxyz)
Date: 11/29/05
- Next message: Peter Pearson: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Previous message: Newsbox: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- In reply to: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: Jeremy: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:26:35 -0500
On 29 Nov 2005 15:41:19 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:
>> You can disclaim anything you want, in a USA Federal Court, you're
>> disclaimer can be valued at the toilet paper level.
>
> Can I have some of whatever you're on? It must be good stuff. Except for
> wild speculation, you have not pointed to anything that would have the
> remotest chance of standing up a a basis of claim.
Having been sued, professionally witnessed, won and lost, on such cases,
Ill take the realities I know for the theory you purport.
> So, let me extend to you the same invitation I made to Borky: cite some
> cases - ***, any cases! - of successful suits for failing to update free
> software. Any jurisdiction - I'll even settle for Burkina Faso.
>
> Regards,
It's not worth the effort to attempt to dissuade folks like you who have
delusional senses of actual court actions.
-- Drop the alphabet for email
- Next message: Peter Pearson: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Previous message: Newsbox: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- In reply to: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: Jeremy: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]