Re: is this webpage secure?
From: Newsbox (nospam_for_me_please_at_thanks.invalid)
Date: 11/29/05
- Next message: Ari Silverstein: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Previous message: ToYKillAS: "Re: Weird.."
- In reply to: Dr Balwinder Singh Dheeman: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Next in thread: Peter Pearson: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Reply: Peter Pearson: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Reply: Proteus: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:25:33 -0500
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:26:32 +0530, Dr Balwinder Singh Dheeman wrote:
> Proteus wrote:
>> I am told by people in charge at the campus where I teach that this login
>> page is secure, that the form login info (username, password) is secure
>> when sent. But the browser page (Firefox, Mandriva Linux) info says the
>> page is not encrypted, not secure. Can someone clarify how such a login
>> page can securely transmit the login info? Link to login page is below:
>> http://www.lsc.edu/Online/VirtualCampusLogin.cfm
>
> No, I don't think; you are sending clear text data via _http_ (port 80),
> where as URL's for secure pages send encrypted data via _https_ (http
> via ssl, port 443).
>
> You can verify/confirm it by capturing data on port 80 and, or 443 with
> help of tcpdump(8) and, or ethereal(1).
I have come across similar "secure" logins on non-secure pages, also
questioned and was reassured, and did capture what was actually
transmitted. It was in fact encrypted, in the case that I looked at. I
suspect that each such case of importance needs individual examination.
It seems there are different ways to divide a page into secure and
non-secure parts, ie. with frames or scripts.
The question that remains in my mind is why anyone would bother with the
additional complexities involved in doing so, along with all the new
possible sources of error and insecurity, especially for a simple login
page. I'm sure those who write these pages have their reasons, but it
seems like a bad idea to me.
- Next message: Ari Silverstein: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Previous message: ToYKillAS: "Re: Weird.."
- In reply to: Dr Balwinder Singh Dheeman: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Next in thread: Peter Pearson: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Reply: Peter Pearson: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Reply: Proteus: "Re: is this webpage secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|