Re: Truecrypt 4.1
From: Ari Silverstein (abcarisilversteinn_at_yahoo.comxyz)
Date: 11/29/05
- Next message: Ari Silverstein: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Previous message: Ari Silverstein: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- In reply to: Jeremy: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: Jeremy: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:13:54 -0500
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:15:29 GMT, Jeremy wrote:
>> In the case of TrueCrypt they're offering software that allegedly secures
>> data. If there's some flaw that makes this software insecure and they
>> DON'T make an acceptable effort to fix that flaw they're negligent. Again,
>> no matter what they're charging for the product.
>>
>
> What law school graduated YOU?
>
> The software was provided FREE and was offered "AS-IS," with no warranty of
> fitness. The terms were clearly spelled out in the license agreement that
> had to be accepted before the software would install itself on the users'
> computers.
>
> God, I can't stand it when "Ten-Cent-Lawyers" go around spouting off
> nonsense like you just did.
You can disclaim anything you want, in a USA Federal Court, you're
disclaimer can be valued at the toilet paper level.
-- Drop the alphabet for email
- Next message: Ari Silverstein: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Previous message: Ari Silverstein: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- In reply to: Jeremy: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: Jeremy: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]