Re: Truecrypt 4.1
From: Borked Pseudo Mailed (nobody_at_pseudo.borked.net)
Date: 11/28/05
- Next message: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Previous message: Borked Pseudo Mailed: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Maybe in reply to: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:45:13 -0700 (MST)
Jeremy wrote:
> "Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
>
>
>> They owe people exactly what they say they'll provide.
>>
>>
> Agreed. Read their Terms and then come back and tell us if they violated
> them.
Nobody ever said they did. A flaw was discovered and corrected. Just like
they SHOULD be. But nemo seems to think this sort of thing is something
special when it's really just the way reputable software vendors do things.
- Next message: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Previous message: Borked Pseudo Mailed: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Maybe in reply to: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Next in thread: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Reply: nemo_outis: "Re: Truecrypt 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|