Re: Problem with disk upgrade of Windows XP Pro

From: Dustin Cook (bughunter.dustin_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/16/05 

Date: 15 Nov 2005 22:45:13 -0800

Kadaitcha Man wrote:

> > Technically, they are different packages. Different GUI, different
> > image file layout.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA! You are truly pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. You
> invoke Symantec and PowerQuest when it suits you then you deny them when it
> doesn't. You're a fucking nutcase. A total, 100% certifiable fr0otcake.

I didn't deny anything. You asked what program other then drive image
could read it's files, and I answered it. Ghost 9 can read the files
fine, but ghost9 isn't drive image.
They are different programs.

I realize you seem to think sp1 natively supported 48bitlba, but
without the registry change and the service pack, it doesn't. Now,
users can take your word for it or mine, it matters not to me. It's
their data they're playing with, not mine.
> Who gives a *** what you said? Without fail, whatever it was you said is
> not in keeping with the facts, which you just quoted, for fucks snakes, and
> you still can't get it right. Your quoted text there from the KB has already
> been dealt with in another post and it has been summarily disposed of on the
> grounds that:

What I said was data loss could occur, and microsoft also said it. But
your right KM, who gives a *** what I said. I realize microsoft says
it's active in sp1, but if you've ever tried loading a windows
(without a service pack) onto a new 200gig drive, you'll be very
disappointed. If you had an OS load before sp1, and you simply install
sp1, it does not enable 48bit lba mode. If sp1 came with your os, it
has it enabled.

But, who really cares? It's not my data that's at risk, nor yours. So
let the user do as he pleases.
> There is no risk of data loss in the situation as described by the OP. Do
> you understand that, monkeyboy? No risk of data loss. None whatsoever. Do I
> now need to tell you why it is so, *** for brains?

You couldn't even tell me why you can't delete files while explorer has
them, you couldn't even tell me how I could prove explorer has it, I
had to do that for you. So no, I don't think I need any of your ***
answers with this either.

In all fairness tho, 4Q is right, nothing I say matters. You'll get
what you want out of it.

Nice trolling tho, your spamming the group now with awards and
everything else. Your such a wanker. Amusing, but a wanker non the
less.

Regards no***,
Dustin Cook
http://bughunter.atspace.org