Are signatures with URLs considered spam?
From: Nick (psstcenter_at_shaw.ca)
Date: 10/30/05
- Next message: Management: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Someone's Busy Scanning"
- Next in thread: Management: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Management: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Steve Welsh: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:36:02 GMT
I understand the point of using URLs as a reference to a certain subject
being discussed, but using a signature with (many)URLs in_every_post, isn't
it some kind of advertising (spam)?
Thanks
Nick
- Next message: Management: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Someone's Busy Scanning"
- Next in thread: Management: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Management: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Reply: Steve Welsh: "Re: Are signatures with URLs considered spam?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|