Re: Banned URL

From: Matt Silberstein (RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 10/29/05 

Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:39:58 GMT

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:41:09 +0200, in alt.computer.security , Jim
Watt <jimwatt@aol.no_way> in
<17a5m19upmeivqs5hilt8qc0cfetr6ltf7@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:21:54 GMT, Matt Silberstein
><RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>Good point. I don't understand how some people can't see that this is
>>a security issue.
>
>no its a 'dickhead who cannot read' issue

It is a good thing you are not ranting. But explain for others, and
try to avoid unmarked snips when you do so, how inability to send
messages with particular content is not a security issue? How is that
not an issue of availability of the data, one of the three legs of IT
security? You should do that by talking about the subject, not by
attacking me, not by name-calling, not by unsubstantiated and
incorrect claims, but by discussing the topic. AOL's content blocking
is a security issue. 

-- 
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Quantcast