Re: Banned URL

From: Notan (notan_at_ddress.com)
Date: 10/27/05 

Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:09:18 -0600

Michael Thompson wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Spamming via your sig.
>
> Your admission

If he was spamming, then so is everyone that puts any kind
of link in their sig.

I don't think so.

Notan

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I am Sorry !You are wrong!
    ... Despite your very humorous Voldemart link, I don't think Mark's sig is ... Andrew, John, or any of the other bike dealers who post here are ... spamming us, either, but other posters occasionally disagree. ... I'd be astonished if it wasn't an automatic sig. ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Re: The pinheaded puppets of rmak
    ... I'LL ADMIT that I just noticed you're not spamming your Pyro ... >> Messiah web page lately... ... he NEVER spammed this newsgroup with his website. ... > the link was in his sig does not make his posts spam; ...
    (rec.music.artists.kiss)
  • Re: old product being sold as new
    ... Please stop spamming your sites here. ... The poor stupid twit doesn't realize that info in sig lines is pretty ... sorry, AMOE, for this carry-over/crossposting. ... been decimated by trolls and we've had to move to a yahoo group ...
    (alt.marketing.online.ebay)
  • OT Re: help you find you want - *SPAM*
    ... You know, other than spamming your sig around, your ... posts of "spam" are a huge waste of time. ... either indicating you LARTed it, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: I am Sorry !You are wrong!
    ... that signature might have been better omitted in this case. ... Despite your very humorous Voldemart link, I don't think Mark's sig is ... spamming. ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)