Re: Banned URL
From: Michael Thompson (news_at_thompsonmike.co.uk)
Date: 10/27/05
- Next message: Notan: "Re: Banned URL"
- Previous message: Shade: "Load balancing firewalls?"
- In reply to: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Banned URL"
- Next in thread: Notan: "Re: Banned URL"
- Reply: Notan: "Re: Banned URL"
- Reply: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Banned URL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:20:54 +0100
Matt Silberstein bashed at the keyboard and came up with this gem of wisdom
in alt.computer.security:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:05:53 +0200, in alt.computer.security , Jim
> Watt <jimwatt@aol.no_way> in
> <ac52m117kqeisvh5pg2g6nk764gf9fqnbk@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:49:13 GMT, Matt Silberstein
>><RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I don't have my website in my sig. And I am sorry if I am giving too
>>>many lines to try to prevent genocide. I guess you have more important
>>>things on your mind.
>>
>>This group is about computer security, there are a lot of other
>>problems in the world this is not the place for them
>>
> And the content of my post was about computer security. That you
> decided to make my sig an issue suggests that you have interests other
> than computer security.
>
>>>> it looks
>>>>more like a cheap attempt to put your political message in peoples
>>>>face rather than anything serious.
>>>
>>>Oh wow, I would try to get people to know about genocide, how immoral
>>>of me.
>>
>>ah so you are spamming.
>
> No, I was posting an on topic question about a security issue.
Spamming via your sig.
Your admission
- Next message: Notan: "Re: Banned URL"
- Previous message: Shade: "Load balancing firewalls?"
- In reply to: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Banned URL"
- Next in thread: Notan: "Re: Banned URL"
- Reply: Notan: "Re: Banned URL"
- Reply: Matt Silberstein: "Re: Banned URL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
