Re: Wireless security
From: Juergen Nieveler (juergen.nieveler.nospam_at_arcor.de)
Date: 10/11/05
- Next message: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Wireless security"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: Wireless security"
- In reply to: John Hyde: "Re: Wireless security"
- Next in thread: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Wireless security"
- Reply: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Wireless security"
- Reply:(deleted message) John Hyde: "Re: Wireless security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Alun Jones: "Re: Wireless security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 11 Oct 2005 09:54:22 GMT
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
> I did find this interesting quote about WEP.
>
> "WEP is better than nothing
>
> If you can't use WPA, perhaps because you can't afford new base
> stations and Panther upgrades for all your laptops, at least enable
> WEP, feeble though it may.
I don't agree with that, actually. Turning on WEP will make you think
"Oh, I got at least SOME security", so you'll never know when your
security isn't there anymore.
Either go for real security, or no security - if you have no encryption
enabled, you'll at least always remember that there's a good reason to
be carefull.
Juergen Nieveler
-- 42? 7 and a half million years and all you can come up with is 42?!
- Next message: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Wireless security"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: Wireless security"
- In reply to: John Hyde: "Re: Wireless security"
- Next in thread: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Wireless security"
- Reply: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Wireless security"
- Reply:(deleted message) John Hyde: "Re: Wireless security"
- Reply:(deleted message) Alun Jones: "Re: Wireless security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|