Re: VoIP wiretapping rules to be considered
From: Imhotep (Imhotep_at_nospam.net)
Date: 10/01/05
- Next message: Imhotep: "Re: VoIP wiretapping rules to be considered"
- Previous message: Mike Preston: "Re: Public Access WIFI Security"
- Maybe in reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: VoIP wiretapping rules to be considered"
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: VoIP wiretapping rules to be considered"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:04:11 -0400
Jim Watt wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:21:42 -0400, Imhotep <Imhotep@nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Jim Watt wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:03:31 -0400, Imhotep <Imhotep@nospam.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Broadband providers and internet phone services have until spring 2007
>>>>to follow a new and complex set of rules designed to make it easier for
>>>>police to seek wiretaps, federal regulators have ruled."
>>>>
>>>>http://management.silicon.com/government/0,39024677,39152744,00.htm
>>>
>>> Thats the downside of living in the evil empire.
>>> --
>>> Jim Watt
>>> http://www.gibnet.com
>>
>>I agree. We, in the United States, need change in the Congress and the
>>White House....Our Congressman view themselves as Kings and royalty. They
>>have forgotten what their job is supposed to be....
>
> For a change we can agree.
LOLs :-)
> And my Government has no plans or capability to snoop on data traffic.
That is good. As I said in another post, Americans *need* to start voting.
We have too many bad politicians here....
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com
Im
- Next message: Imhotep: "Re: VoIP wiretapping rules to be considered"
- Previous message: Mike Preston: "Re: Public Access WIFI Security"
- Maybe in reply to:(deleted message) Jim Watt: "Re: VoIP wiretapping rules to be considered"
- Next in thread: Jim Watt: "Re: VoIP wiretapping rules to be considered"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
